NFL draft. Firstly, don’t forget to check out our review of Seattle’s 2. It’s a detailed look at not just the players drafted but also the thought process on what should be considered a positive class overall. I’m starting to get into the 2. In the meantime, I put this together a couple of weeks ago. Ten names for 2. 01. Saquon Barkley (RB, Penn State)If they can both stay healthy, the 2.

The morning commute across Manhattan on Thursday was a typical-as-of-late snarl of bottlenecks and delays, with debris of unknown origins causing an oppressive backup.

Firstly, don't forget to check out our review of Seattle's 2017 draft class from yesterday. It's a detailed look at not just the players drafted but also. October 3, 2017 Oyster Lipton 3136 circa 1942 $2500.00 CAD. e10141. Something for the watch and Canadiana collector. A beautifully preserved Rolex Oyster Lipton 3136. In California, the highways have special lanes for High Occupancy Vehicles (HOV). The definition of ‘high occupancy’ to ride in those lanes is two, the smallest. · Howard’s Very Own Displays Brilliance and Entrepreneurship. Prominent HBCU hosts third annual business summit.

It’s hard to separate the two names at the top of this list. If you want to know how Penn State suddenly returned to relevance in 2. Saquon Barkley. He’s a genuine X- factor at running back with freakish power and athleticism. He can do a 6. 00lbs squad and reportedly managed a 4. Stud. Derrius Guice (RB, LSU)Guice is a fantastic talent capable of being a Heisman candidate if LSU can cobble together a passing game and remain relevant deep into the season.

He’s incredibly sudden and explosive with enough size (5- 1. He plays with a Thomas Rawls level of intensity. His performances against Texas A& M and Arkansas when Leonard Fournette was injured were incredible. Guice is must- watch TV. He ran a 4. 3. 8 forty on campus two years ago at a heavier 2. You see that breakaway speed on tape along with incredible cut- back and change of direction ability and he can stop on a dime and accelerate unlike virtually any other running back in college football.

He is incredible. Vita Vea (DT, Washington)With so many Huskies turning pro this year, it was a bit of a surprise that Vea didn’t join them. There’s every chance he would’ve been a top- 1. Players like Vea are rare. Not only does he have the size and length to control the LOS and anchor as a nose tackle — he also has plus athleticism at 6- 5 and 3.

He had five sacks last season. Reports suggested he was informed by NFL sources to get in peak shape and enter the 2. If he achieves this, a top- 1.

Haloti Ngata. Bradley Chubb (EDGE, NC State)It was a major surprise when Chubb announced he wouldn’t be turning pro this year. Last season he recorded 2. TFL’s and 1. 0 sacks and there’s a very good chance he would’ve been a first round pick. He’s a high- intensity pass rusher with a great personality.

He’s the cousin of Georgia running back Nick Chubb. If he can match Nick’s SPARQ- destroying performance before his knee injury, he could land in the top- 1.

At 6- 4 and 2. 75lbs he’s versatile can rush inside or out. His standout performance might’ve been the ‘Hurricane Bowl’ against Notre Dame last year.

He dealt with the conditions better than anyone. Arden Key (EDGE, LSU)In high school Key was already benching 2.

He has gradually become a major impact player for LSU, setting a school record for sacks in 2. TFL’s. Recent reports had Key stepping away from the program for ‘personal reasons’ but he recently confirmed he wouldn’t be sitting out the season. Teams will be looking into the situation as he prepares to turn pro in the next year — but there’s no doubting his potential at 6- 6 and 2. He’s similar to Leonard Floyd (top- 1. Trey Adams (T, Washington)Big, long and athletic — Trey Adams is one of the few emerging left tackles with a big opportunity to forge a successful pro- career.

He plays in a good offense to judge his potential and he’s big — listed at 6- 8 and 3. He moves well on his feet for his size and shows the ability to get into position, set and finish blocks. He plays with toughness and enjoys run blocking. If there were more players like Adams in college football, the NFL would feel a lot happier. Minkah Fitzpatrick (S, Alabama)With so many studs on the Alabama defense it’s difficult to stand out sometimes. Fitzpatrick managed it multiple times in 2. He had six interceptions (two returned for touchdowns), five TFL’s, seven PBU’s and a forced fumble.

He ran a 4. 0. 5 short shuttle at the 2. SPARQ combine while jumping a 3. He’s an intelligent, savvy ballhawk who could be a major leader and component of Alabama’s defense next season with so many big names departing for the NFL this year. Sam Darnold (QB, USC)The same thing happens every year. We pour over the quarterbacks in a draft class and declare next years crop to be better. Darnold is the latest example of a prospect being vaulted into the spotlight a little prematurely.

He’s a converted linebacker and hasn’t even been a college starter for a full season. At times his play is majestic and he clearly has an innate, natural flair for the position. He extends plays, he has the arm strength and accuracy. There is so much to like.

He also has some erraticism to his play and there are ‘Jake Locker moments’. He has a ton of potential but he’ll be under a lot of pressure to live up to the hype this year. Connor Williams (T, Texas)A former High School teammate of Solomon Thomas, Williams has really blossomed from a three- star recruit to a genuine NFL prospect. Measurables will be key for Williams. He isn’t big — listed at 6- 6 and 2. He needs to get into that 3.

He’s a very willing run blocker with natural bend and foot speed. There’s a major edge to his play, built off an intriguing backstory.

He and Trey Adams have much higher ceilings than the more often discussed Mike Mc. Glinchey at Notre Dame. Derrick Nnadi (DT, Florida State)He’s only really scratching the surface of what he’s capable of.

In 2. 01. 6 he emerged as a highly impactful, mostly two- down defender. He had 1. 0. 5 TFL’s and six sacks. He and Demarcus Walker lived in the backfield and played off each other.

Nnadi has the power to handle the run and the quickness, power and an effective swim/rip to break into the backfield. He’s 6- 1 and 3. 12lbs so perfectly sized to act as a disruptive interior presence.

Meet The People Who Say They’re Serious About Building The Hyperloop. The morning commute across Manhattan on Thursday was a typical- as- of- late snarl of bottlenecks and delays, with debris of unknown origins causing an oppressive backup of the city’s subway system. Watch The Brave One Streaming.

It was the latest in a string of examples of the deteriorating, century- old system, another sign of the significant level of investment that’s needed to bring the subway up to 2. Though it was an otherwise unsurprising morning, I’m mentioning it because, several hundred miles away, as New Yorkers endured another annoying trek around town through a system of the past, a theoretical, futuristic solution to public transit woes in the U. S.—the Hyperloop—took another small- step toward coming to fruition. But, alluring as it is, the vacuum transit system remains a long- shot—even with 1. Remember when Elon Musk claimed he was so busy with space and cars that he was willing to hand over …Read more Read.

That was the news from Hyperloop One, an ambitious startup among a number of companies that have taken on the challenge of building the hyperloop system, first outlined back in 2. Tesla CEO Elon Musk. On Thursday, Hyperloop One named the ten potential routes—from Mumbai to Denver—as part of a long- running contest launched by the company to find ideal places to build the first hyperloop tracks.

Hyperloop One has an extremely- ambitious timeline, aiming to have three full- scale systems operating by 2. Four of the proposed routes are situated in the U.

S.—including the one in Denver, but also a run from Chicago, through Columbus, to Pittsburgh; a lengthier trek from Dallas to Laredo to Houston; and a shorter span between Miami and Orlando. Expectedly, Hyperloop One’s CEO, Rob Lloyd, was elated to share the news.“We’re doing things faster than any other kind of infrastructure project has ever moved,” Lloyd said in an interview. That’s what’s exciting about this.” Beyond Hyperloop One, there’s Hyperloop Technologies. And Musk himself has indicated he’s willing to use his newfound Boring Company to get in the hyperloop game.

Of course, that’s contingent on whether he receives anything beyond “verbal” government approval of his proposed system.) Hyperloop One recently crossed a major milestone, after it hurdled a vehicle through a…Read more Read. But it’s Hyperloop One that touts itself as being furthest along in the process of making this dream a reality, saying it’s the “only company in the world that has built a full- scale Hyperloop system.” Sounds like 2. Not so much. There Is A Track Record Here. A quick reminder of how a hyperloop is supposed to work: essentially, the idea involves building a tube system, in which people- carrying pods travel along a cushion of air, by way of a variety of methods.

For Hyperloop One, the company developed a proprietary electric propulsion system, using linear electric motors that, it says, produces motion in a straight line. Air gets sucked out of the tube, making it incredibly- thin, and then the pods take off, levitating using electromagnetic currents. Or, as the company explains: In a traditional motor, the rotor (rotating part) spins inside the stator (static part), or vice- versa; in a linear motor, the stator is unwrapped and laid out flat, and the “rotor” moves past it in a straight line. In our case, the stators are installed along the track where we need acceleration. We add power to the stators, which produces electromagnetic currents that interact with the “rotor” elements underneath the vehicle to create propulsion.

The rotor and stator never touch. At least on a granular- scale, it’s not as farfetched as it sounds: the company indeed has a proven track record. In May, Hyperloop One successfully conducted a demo run of a device that traveled 7. Nevada desert. Then, last month, the company sent a 2. It’s hard not to be enraptured at the sight. The core idea of a hyperloop is to allow a bunch of people to travel between major cities quickly and easily, and with airlines originating from the seventh circle of Hell and woefully- underfunded train systems being targeted for potential cuts by lawmakers, a theoretical hyper- fast trip through a pneumatic tube doesn’t sound too bad.

It isn’t much of a question anymore whether the technology could work—the enjoyment of traveling in a hypothetical hyperloop, however, and whether it’ll effectively work at a large- scale, probably merits further debate—but it’s the logistical hurdles that remain. How much is a tube system from Chicago to Pittsburgh going to cost? That’s a gargantuan question, and it’s still basically anyone’s best guess. Lloyd demurred when asked about cost.)Hyperloop One generally offers that capital and operating costs will “range widely based on route and application,” but the company’s optimistic that it would remain competitive with the typically- significant up- front costs of rail. The company said Thursday’s announcement is the next step in a process to answering those questions. In part, that’ll be done with a feasibility study that’s being conducted with the Colorado Department of Transportation and AECOM, Hyperloop One said. The study, the company said, will examine “transportation demand, economic benefits, proposed routes and potential strategies, regulatory environments and alignment with overall CDOT high- speed travel, rail and freight plans.” (A 3.

Cheyenne, Wyoming, Denver, and Pueblo, Colorado, was picked as a finalist Thursday.)“These are multi- billion dollar projects,” Lloyd said by phone. And, obviously, in order for them to make sense, they need to have an economic return.”Lloyd sounded an upbeat tone about finding a viable path forward to achieving a solid return because, as he put it, all funding options are on the table, including a public- private model. He said the feasibility study will give stakeholders a sense of the economic potential, engineering challenges, and other preliminary costs.“That’s our goal,” he said. That’s our objective.”The Entrance Of Musk. Lloyd didn’t budge when I asked about Musk’s recent entry into the field.

In July, the Tesla chief stirred up a rousing comedic bit, when he haphazardly took to Twitter to announce he’d received “verbal” government approval to build a hyperloop between New York City and Washington D. C. In reality, verbal government approval could amount to receiving the green- light from someone named Mr. Government. But Musk has since indicated he’s serious about getting intimately involved in the hyperloop game.

He’s invested—to what degree, it still isn’t clear—in building tunnels using his Boring Company subsidiary, and a Bloomberg report last month said Musk wants to have a role in everything, from conception to construction, for his proposed NYC- DC route. It was a significant turnaround from when Musk first introduced the Hyperloop idea; he is running a car company and a space firm after all. Lloyd’s not phased, though. In a hypothetical world where flying taxis are real, autonomous cars ferry people around town, and hyperloops carry you and I between major hubs, Musk’s intercity routes could work seamlessly with Hyperloop One’s large- scale plans, Lloyd said.“I’d love to imagine that there would be more efficient last- mile technologies connecting to where we put a hyperloop portal,” he said, “and all of that is actually part of our strategy.

There’s some really good things happening in transportation.”Is It The Right Investment. But those really good things—high- speed future vacuum travel tubes, the fantastical idea of flying cars—have a heavy burden of proving they can operate safely and effectively. Lloyd’s company wants his hyperloop pods to travel close to 7.

Chicago and Pittsburgh to roughly 4. Miami to Orlando would take 2. Hyperloop One wants to bring that to life within a hopeful timeline that suggests a rapid development of seven years from inception to launching its first routes.